What's on your mind?
TEXT
POLL
- All2815 posts
- General2413 posts
- CM Discussions65 posts
- Questions & Answers222 posts
- News/Announcements43 posts
- General Discussions53 posts
- Cleanup Concerns19 posts
Sort by
Card Layout
She attempted to commit omnicide.
If i want to add a non official alternative version of an existent villain. Should I compare it with its original version or describe it without taking the official version into account?
14 Votes in Poll
Pure evil? Near Pure evil? Inconsistently heinous? or villainous benchmark?
why tf are the proposals still left
it's above the deadline now and they haven't been checked
Why is he commenting this on the post where i SPECIFICALLY said i hate Over PE Wikis?
PE is evil enough, We don't need worse
Im @startayo x tidyping
3 Votes in Poll
22 Votes in Poll
7 Votes in Poll
Seriously? Why did Mr.Jay 641 had to delete the homophobic category all because they already have a Xenophobes category, because to me this is very biased, because the Hate Sink Wiki has a homophobic category, well also having a xenophobic category, so how come they get a category but the villains fanon wiki doesn’t? This doesn’t seem fair in square, I feel like people just use excuses saying that they already have a xenophobic category despite the fact that there’s an phobic category doesn’t say anything about discrimination against sexuality, so I feel like the deletion of the homophobic category is unfair and biased.
I don't care much if I was busy at not putting them on those wikis. Her was the reason why I didn't because I used my main account very often. But please don't hate me like my enemy did.
I was looking at a page I made on this wiki and I saw this on there and I don't know what messy means in this kinda context so can somebody tell me how to make it not messy?
Recently i noticed that Fnas (sonic's) villain pages got y'know, fixed? But i think we could add the maniac mania informations aswell. I mean, maniac mania is canon to the series... kinda? So why not?
Also- Toymare is my fav. Character, just sayin'
In SMG4, despite having many stories filled with action and conflict, there isn't usually a consistent secondary antagonist like in more structured series, and that's mainly due to the nature of the show's format and style. Here's why: 🎭 1. SMG4 is primarily an absurdist, parody comedy Many stories in SMG4 are self-contained chapters or short arcs. The conflicts tend to be occasional, comical, or random, rather than part of an established narrative with villain hierarchies. Because of this, it's not structured as a series with a main villain and a second-in-command, but rather as a show of unpredictable mayhem. 👹 2. When there are antagonists, they tend to be one-offs or arc-based Examples like Zero, the corrupted Axol, or even the Guard Dog from the Castle arc act as the main antagonists of a time-based arc. There's no room for a fixed secondary antagonist, because each story or arc reinvents the character roles. Sometimes even the protagonists (like Mario or SMG4 itself) act as "antagonists" due to their absurd actions. 🔄 3. Constantly Changing Tone and Characters The world of SMG4 is dynamic and chaotic by design, making it difficult to maintain traditional antagonist hierarchies like in a structured series. A character can be an enemy in one episode and a friend in another (like Bob or Waluigi). 💡 So... is this a problem? Not necessarily. SMG4 doesn't follow the logic of a series with a classic plot, but rather mixes absurd humor, narrative chaos, and occasional serious arcs. That's why the figure of the secondary antagonist is neither necessary nor functional in this context.